Main Menu

Stephen Hawking’s mistakes

 

Perhaps Hawking’s biggest mistake is that he considers the universe to be unique in matter and wants to reach the truths and secrets of existence by relying only on empirical sciences, and because he is looking for the truth with imperfect tools, he is unable to access it. For this reason, he tries to deny the facts and replaces his illusions and fantasies with the truth.

The exclusiveness of the existence in the world of matter causes the influence of other worlds to be denied, and because Hawking does not believe in the metaphysical world, and in other words, he has no knowledge of this world, he denies its influence on the world of matter and ridicules it, and the reason for the denial God is by them because of his lack of awareness of immaterial worlds and immaterial beings.

We will prove immaterial worlds to disprove some of Hawking’s theories. After proving these worlds, we have stated their relationship in order to make it clear that in order to perform actions in the world of matter, the longitudinal connection between the worlds will cause the realization of actions. The influence of the higher worlds on the lower worlds in Islam and the Quran is interpreted as angels and gods or lords of all kinds.

Hawking is only familiar with entropy energy, which causes disorder and chaos, while syntropy energy is opposite to entropy and increases order, he is unaware of this energy.

Hawking is a researcher and theorist, some of his findings and theories are wrong and in some cases childish. Because his writings are associated with physics and scientific terms, he has gained many fans. Of course, it seems that most of his readers and fans, because they consider him a prominent physicist and astronomer, have accepted his other ideas about creation and God, while many of these opinions are in conflict with experimental science.

Perhaps because of his great fame, Hawking sometimes gets so excited that he violates the most obvious scientific and intellectual matters and denies them, for example, he says that the total energy of the universe is zero.

And he also says that the world is finite but has no boundary, while the surface of the sphere is its boundary.

He mistakenly called the possibility of circular movement and non-interruption of movement in the spherical space as boundless.

If the expansion of the universe is disproved, most of Hawking’s theories will be rejected. We will prove that the expansion of the universe is impossible.

Hawking’s definition of space and time is incorrect. He considered the space and the area illuminated by a star to be a general meaning of space, and therefore his other arguments will have problems.

The definition of time based on the speed of light is the physical definition of light, not its true definition. Because in Hawking’s opinion, time is derived from the speed of light and light is bent under gravity, so time will also be bent.

But real time has no dependence on light and therefore will not be bent due to gravity, nor will it be fast or slow. Such a time has no objective existence outside and is not considered the fourth dimension.

This time has nothing to do with space.

Based on real time, the slowing down of time due to gravity would be meaningless.

Therefore, many of Hawking’s theories will be rejected and unacceptable with real time.

Hawking’s familiarity with logic, Islamic philosophy and divine religions was very little, and this caused his errors to increase.

Without knowledge of philosophy and religion, especially Islam, he comments on the issues of philosophy and religion and tries to challenge them.

This ignorant method is intellectually condemned.

Therefore, one of Hawking’s mistakes is that he started answering religious and philosophical issues without knowledge of philosophy and religion.

If immaterial worlds and God are proven, most of Howking’s theories will be invalidated.

Hawking does not believe in the law of causality, and for this reason, he believes that creatures are random

He also does not accept the law of conservation of energy with his opinions such as: The world was created from nothing.

Hawking wants to achieve the theory everything with an incorrect and incomplete method, while by knowing a part of the world, you cannot gain knowledge of the whole world. Someone can have complete knowledge of the world, who is aware of all the details of the world, and such a person is an imam or a prophet. Imam and Prophet because they are in relationship with God, they can have full knowledge of everything.

He says: “We now know that every particle has an antiparticle, with which it can annihilate.(In the case of the force-carrying  particles, the antiparticles are the same as the particles themselves.)There could be whole antiworlds and antipeople made out of antiparticles.”

It is acceptable that every particle has an antiparticle .But the antiparticle does not destroy the particle but complements it and each one is incomplete without the other and they reach balance in the presence of each other. In other words, the particle and the antiparticle are opposites, not contradictory to each other. Opposites are like black and white, good and evil, heaven and hell, night and day. None of the opposites destroys the other, but their effect is in opposition to the other, without each of them, the world will not be complete and balanced.

With the anti-particle, another world does not arise apart from the existing world, but it creates a complete world alongside the particle, so the anti- world and the world are intermingled and each cannot be realized without the other. These two are like the threads of a fabric that complement each other, although their effect is somehow opposite to the other.

If the antiparticle is the destroyer of the particle, the universe would not have formed at all, and it is said that the number of particles is more than the antiparticle and therefore the universe will not be destroyed, is an unprovable statement.

Therefore, the anti-worlds and anti-people are not our destroyers, but they are our completers, like the problems in human life make a person stronger, not the destruction of a person, and if a person is not in the midst of problems, he will be like a lion in a cage, which gradually loses its strength. He loses and becomes like a tame animal.

Moreover, the presence of antiparticles does not cause the creation of antiworlds and anti-peoples, rather, particles and antiparticles form one world, not two or more worlds, just as positive and negative energy form one world.

He says: “At the big bang itself the universe is thought to have had zero size, and so to have been infinitely hot. But as the universe expanded, the temperature of the radiation decreased. One second after the big bang, it would have fallen to about ten thousand million degrees.”

The universe is infinite, and therefore the infinite does not become zero. It is like saying that the whole is equal to the part, or that the infinite is the same as zero.

Therefore, before the big bang (although the big bang is a point of dispute and is not acceptable from our point of view), the density of the universe was infinite and its size was not zero.

Rather, it can be said that all the particles were connected and there was no void between them.

Also, the size of the universe was not zero or small, but the size of the very dense mass was small or zero.

It means that the universe or infinite space existed, but there were no heavenly bodies in it.

 

We will soon be writing a book on Hawking’s mistakes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Allrights reserved. Designed By Darkoob